Below is a suggested question outline - you can and should adapt it, reorganize, revise it.

Introduction:

• What is the larger project this report is a part of?
• Where is this study area?
• Why might these faults be of interest?

Previous work and background:

• What is the stratigraphic unit the faults occur in here?
• What have other researchers said about faulting and tectonism in this area?
• In general, how do faults form/grow?

Methodology:

• How, when and by whom was the data collected?
• How has the data been plotted, analyzed and why?
• What might be biases in the data?

Results:

• What are preferred orientations the faults take?
• What types of geometries do they show (e.g. en echelon, splays, characteritistic length, etc.)?
• What type of minerals and textures do you see in the fault rocks?
• How do the fault attributes change along their length?
• What patterns in fault characteristics can be seen spatially (spacing, facing, etc.)?
• If there are any cross cutting relationships, which fault trend is older and which is younger?

Discussion:

• How do these faults compare with others mapped in the area?
• How do they compare orientation wise to regional tectonic trends (e.g. Wyoming-Colorado lineament, Black Hills Uplift)?
• How do these faults compare in orientation to the veins in the area?
• What do the observed fault geometries suggest about the history and mechanics of fault formation?
• Is there any constraint on the age of faulting?
• What work could be done in the future to clarify understanding?

Conclusions:

• What are the three to four main points the reader should take away with them?

References cited:

Figures:

• Illustrative photos/ sketches of fault geometries.
• Rose diagram of fault orientations.
• Map showing fault positions and orientations.
• Diagram/photos showing along the fault changes.